Introduction

Hi Mrs. Zaitul Zahirah,
Please check all the articles regarding the Issue on Ignorance Engineering Geology Informations.

Feel free to leave any comments and enjoy your reading.

Thank You and Best Regards,
Azrul Haziq, Ahmad Zaid, Ameer Hakim, Tara & Zahir Fikri .

Zahir Fikri's Articles

IGNORING ENGINEERING GEOLOGY A COSTLY MISTAKE AT PENTALIA,  CYPRUS

1.      INTRODUCTION

The  importance  of  geology  in  engineering  work  is  self evident. Nevertheless, the input of engineering geologists is not always requested or is sometimes ignored, even  when readily available.

Cyprus  is  an  island  in  the  Mediterranean  Sea.  The  south west area of Cyprus has a long history of slope instability, particularly in areas of high elevation. In extreme cases the decision  was  made  to  abandon  areas  of  instability  and relocate villages (Charalambous and Petrides 1997). These decisions  were  based  on  administrative,  social  reasons  as well  as on the  results of geotechnical investigations  where engineering geology was an important element. Therefore, it is  somewhat  surprising  that  engineering  geology  was  not fully considered in recent transportation projects.

Paphos,    the     southwestern   district    of     Cyprus,    has experienced    major    development    in    its    infrastructure including  several  new  roads  linking  existing  villages  and ne developments.   This   paper   reports   on   th road constructed in 2002 to link the villages of Nata, Pentalia and Panayia, in Paphos (Figure 1) The laying out of the road was  based  on  several  transportation  considerations,  but ignored the engineering geology of the site and the history of instabilities in this area.   This omission has been costly, with  the  road  being  subject  to  recurring  stability  problems. This has resulted in considerable delays, inconvenience and cost.   After   exploring   several   stabilizatio options,   the decision was made to move the road to more stable ground.


2.      FEASIBILTY ASSESSMENT

In  the  early  phases  of  a  project  it  is  unlikely  that  there  is access  to  the  full  range  of  geotechnical  data  required  for design. Instead, it is common to rely on past experience and rules  of  thumb.  Hoek  (1999)  has  provided  an  example  of how  engineering  geology  can  be  employed  in  the  early stages of highway design:

“…in  evaluating  three  alternative  highway  routes  through mountainous           terrain,   the          engineering          geologists             or geotechnical   engineer   woul look   for   routes   with   the minimum number of unstable landforms, ancient landslides, difficult river crossings…...

This  statement  is  reinforced  by  the  observation  that  quite often   inadequate   consideration   is   given   to   engineering geology:

“…it  is  amazing  how  often  a  highway  will  be  laid  out  by transportation engineers with more concern of lines of sight and radii of curves than for the geological conditions which happen to occur along the route.

Unfortunatel the   Pentali highwa is    case   where inadequate   attention   wa give to   obvious   signs   of instability.   This   had   considerable   consequences   as   the highway traverses mountainous terrain, in areas of reported landslide and seismic activity, Figure 1.




Figure 1. Hillshade map of the highway.


Nevertheless,   little   attentio wa give to   engineering geology.    This    was    somewhat    surprising    given    that Charalambous   (1991)   had   provided    geological   and geotechnical  map  of  the  area  where  she  clearly  identified areas  of  disturbed  ground  as  well  as  landslide  scarps (Figure  2).   It  would  appear  that  this  information  was  not taken into consideration when the highway was laid out.

It  was  only  when  the  first  instability  problems  materialised during construction that input was sought from engineering geologists.   Althoug  series   of   investigations    were undertaken and several stabilization options explored, at the end of the day the decision was made to move the highway to what is perceived to be stable ground.


3.      BACKGROUND

Construction of the road linking the villages of Nata, Pentalia and  Panayia  (along  P453-P513)  begun  in  late  2001.  As early  as  January  2002  it  had  already  displayed  signs  of instability.  It  was  only  then  that  the  input  of  engineering geologists   wa requested.   Figure    is    satellite   map illustrating the highway and the area of instability.




Figure 2. Geotechnical Map of the area.




Subsequent investigations helped to record the evolution of events  rather   than  providing  a  comprehensive  solution. Finally,  when  the  geotechnical  studies  were  completed  it was  decided  to  relocate  the  road  rather  than  continue  to repair  or  attempt  to  stabilize  it.  If  an  engineering  geology study  had  been  undertaken  prior  to  construction  of  the highway, it would have clearly contributed to a better choice of site.

3.1       Geology

The   highwa traverses   th Mamonia   Complex,    very incongruent  collection  of  allochtonous  Upper  Triassic  to Lowe Cretaceous   sedimentar formations   and   Upper Triassic mafic igneous rocks. The autochthonous Kannaviou formation  of  Campanian  age  is  also  present,  comprising bentonitic  clays  and  volcanoclastic  sandstones.  These  are areas of low strength and have historically been associated with slope stability problems.


Figure 3. Satellite map of the highway area.

3.2  Past landslide activity 

Pantazis (1969) cites several landslides in the Paphos area. These landslides have often resulted in partial or complete relocation of several villages, as reported by Charalambous and Petrides (1997). It is traditionally accepted that past 
slope instability has been triggered by intensive rainfalls and the earthquakes of 1953. Northmore  et al. (1986) suggest 
that, in earlier times, landslides were a fact of life in these areas. A plausible reason for the observed landslide activity 
was that villages were traditionally constructed near the contact of argillaceous cohesive soils and chalks where 
there are natural water springs.  

The highway traverses an area that has visible signs of past landslide activity. The fact that the nearby village of 
Pentalia, was relocated as a result of frequent landslides, should have identified the need for an engineering geology 
investigation prior to the construction of the highway. Furthermore the study by Charalambous (1991) had clearly 
identified that the highway was traversing an area with visible signs of ground instability.  

3.3  Seismic activity 

Figure 4 is a map of the Paphos district. It illustrates the cluster of seismic activity during the last ten years in the 
area traversed by the highway. In this figure seismic events are classified in three categories based on their magnitude: 
less than 2.5 M; between 2.5 and 3.5 M; and between 3.5 to 4.5 M.  Although the seismic history was not considered prior to the laying out of the highway, there is no evidence that the observed instabilities were influenced by seismic activity. 


Figure 4. Recorded seismic events during 1997-2007 in the 
vicinity of the highway.

3.4  Rainfall data 

Rainfall in Cyprus is mostly confined to the winter and spring months, with the highest average annual rainfall reported on 
the Troodos mountains. The road is within 24 km from the summit of the Troodos mountains. Rainfalls in this area can 
be intense and are the main triggering mechanisms of landslides. 

Figure 5 provides the monthly precipitation data for the station nearest to the highway at Lemona. The station is 
about 5 km from the site of observed instability. Of interest, is the unusual for the area, high precipitation in December 
2001, December 2002 and January 2004. This heavy precipitation had an adverse  impact on the stability of the highway.


Figure 5. Rainfall data from the nearest weather station to 
the highway.

4. LANDSILDE TIMELINE 

The road linking the villages of Nata, Pentalia and Panayia (along P453-P513) had already displayed signs of instability 
in January 2002 while the road was still under construction.  The development of long cracks in the road,  illustrated in 
Figures 6 and 7 was a cause  of concern. The consensus was that these were linked to higher than usual rainfalls and 
snowfalls during December 2001. Following some remedial measures the road was completed and opened to traffic.


Figure 6. Initial signs of instability, January 2002





Figure 7. Initial signs of instability, January 2002.

It was not long after completion of the highway that several new sets of cracks appeared on the surface of the asphalt. It 
was suggested that the slip surface was in the argillaceous substratum below the road and talus. By April 2003 it was 
decided to record these localized cracks (Figure 8 from Kyriakou 2003). These extended a long stretch of the 
highway as well as in the embankment. As shown in Figures 9 and 10 these cracks were long and quite deep cutting 
through the asphalt and substrata layers. Figure 11 illustrates the development of a major crack in the embankment of the highway. 

At this point in time it was accepted that the highway was in an area of previous landslide activity. It was also recognized that it was necessary to consider adequate measures to ensure the operation of the highway.  It was then postulated 
that the intensive rainfalls could have re-activated a previously dormant landslide. The situation was aggravated 
as a result of poor draining. Furthermore, it was recognized that the road embankment was  directly over low strength 
materials.



Figure 8. Recorded fissures along the highway, Scale 1: 1000, April 2003


Figure 9. Signs of instability, April  2003.


Figure 10. Signs of instability, April  2003


Figure 11. Signs of instability, April  2003

Given that damage to the highway was over 300 m long, and the fact that this is a rural area, it was not possible to justify major stabilization works. Instead, it was decided that a stabilizing toe, associated with improved drainage, may provide a satisfactory option. Preliminary limit equilibrium analysis suggested that the  use of a stabilizing toe may have been adequate for the assumed shallow failure. 

4.1 Data collection and instrumentation 

Due to a variety of administrative decisions there was a delay in collecting more field data. Nevertheless, by October 2004 five cored boreholes ranging from 30 to 35 m depth were driven along two sections of the highway, Figure 8. The encountered layer of talus was up to 8 m deep, and characterized by the presence of whitish clasts of chalks of variable size and shape in a loose to medium dense calcareous silty matrix. This was underlain by the mélange typical of the region. 
The mélange is characterized by reddish brown clayey silt containing clasts of the Mamonia formation. Of interest, and cause of alarm, was the evidence of slickenside at different depths in the mélange observed in boreholes A1, A2 and A3. 

4.2 Piezometric Data 

Two piezometers were installed in boreholes A1 and B3. The recorded levels are shown in Figure 12. These confirmed the perception of a perched water table within the talus, overlying the impermeable melange.



Figure 12. Observation wells.

The level of the perched water table is controlled by the seasonal precipitation and can  fluctuate considerably.  In the same geological setting it is not unusual to note the presence of seasonal and temporary springs along the talus-melange contact or within the highly weathered and disturbed mélange. 

4.3 Ground displacement measurements 

In order to determine the slip surface of the landslide four inclinometers were installed in boreholes A2, A3, B1 and B2. Figure 13 provides some of the early readings for borehole A3. Unfortunately the B2 inclinometer was broken at 3.20 m from ground surface, probably due to major displacement. In retrospect it might have been advantageous to locate the inclinometers at different locations along the length of the highway that showed signs of instability. 


Figure 13. Displacement measurements in borehole A3, initial survey Nov. 23 2004 and final reading Nov. 9 2006.

4.4 Impact of delays 

It should be recalled that the first signs of instability were reported during construction of the highway in January 2002. Although some more data were collected in fact no effective remedial action was  taken other than “filling” the cracks in the asphalt. By the summer of 2005 the situation had deteriorated considerably as shown in Figures 14 and 15 resulting in more areas of instability. 

Following the construction of a terrain model, and further observations it was recognized that the second slip surface, 
at a distance 80 m further from the first vertical cut, was deeper than originally assumed. This prompted further analyses and a re-evaluation of the overall strategy to return this road stretch to circulation. A deeper failure surface would require a bigger volume of buttress. It was also recognized that it would probably be necessary to expropriate more land for these purposes.  

The use of reinforcing piles, which was given consideration in the past, was an expensive option. In order for the piles to 
be successful in strengthening the slip surface they would have to intersect it. In fact an economic analysis of the associated costs for the different remedial measures suggested that in light of the new information, serious consideration should be given to re-routing this stretch of the road. 


Figure 14. Deterioration of the highway, 2005.


Figure 15. Deterioration of the highway, 2005.

In the meantime the situation continued to deteriorate to the level where a horseshoe potential failure surface was identified, Figure 16. It would appear that the cracks in the highway could be extended to old landslide scarps. Furthermore, the highway was unraveling and the cracks opening up further, Figure 17. 


Figure 16. Horseshoe failure.


Figure 17. Widening cracks, November 2006

4.5 Comprehensive Stability Analysis 

A comprehensive stability analysis was undertaken in 2005, described in detail by Hadjigeorgiou et al. (2006). The limit equilibrium analysis used Slide and the finite element employed Phase2, both available from Rocscience (2005). The viability of the stabilization options was investigated using as input the results of triaxial tests. At this time, based on field observations it was recognized that it was necessary to investigate deeper slip surfaces than the original analysis.  

The same geometrical models used in the limit equilibrium analysis in Slide were introduced into the Phase2 finite element analysis package. An example is illustrated in Figure 18 where the maximum shear strain was determined. The strength reduction factor technique was also used to visualize the progression of failure within the slope. The zone of failure was visualised by plotting a total displacement graph. Figure 19 plots the total displacement concentrations and the resulting deformed mesh. The resulting slope geometry closely resembled the observed field conditions.  


Figure 18. Section B-B illustrating the development of 
maximum shear strain concentrations. 


Figure 19. Section B-B deep failure illustrating the 
development of total displacement concentrations. 

5. ALIGNING A NEW ROAD 

The construction of a new road, as the finally adapted solution, has not yet began, although the construction designs are now completed. Figure 20 provides a summary of the available information for the stretch of instability of the Pentalia highway. It shows the existing highway as well as the surficial deposits of talus and melange. The overhanging chalks over the highway are also noted.  

The location of boreholes A1, A2 and A3 as well as B1, B2 and B3 are also identified. Of interest however are the signs 
of all landslide escarps in the chalks and the location of seasonal springs just below the highway in the talus. 

The new road alignment, several meters from the existing road, is also shown in Figure 20. The new alignment is well outside the zone of cracks and settlements that were noted on the existing road. Nevertheless, it is still within an area of 
past instability, and is still in the same geological conditions.  The rational of the transportation engineers is that the 
existing road embankment may act as a stabilizing agent. This was not however demonstrated by further analysis. The 
new works also involve a well designed and effective drainage system along the road. Up the road there will be a diversion channel to reroute surface water away from the road. Whether this shifting of the road, even with improved drainage measures will be sufficient to avoid future instability remains to be seen.  

6. CONCLUSIONS 

The importance of engineering geology in laying out a highway in an area that has been recognised as landslide prone should have been evident. Nevertheless, the Pentalia highway was laid without detailed engineering geology investigations. Furthermore, the existing geological and geomorphologic data appear to have been ignored.  

Once instabilities appeared, it was decided to repair and continue construction of the highway. This approach did not 
alleviate the problem. The results of subsequent investigations provided plausible explanations of the failure mechanisms, but were not followed by prompt intervention or the implementation of effective stabilization measures. Once all the studies were completed and all options explored the decision was made to move the highway, Figure 20. Nevertheless, the proposed new highway alignment is still in a landslide prone area. Whether this will succeed in securing the long term stability of the highway remains to be seen. 

In retrospect, it would have been beneficial if a comprehensive engineering geology investigation had preceded the marking of the highway in this particular area. Furthermore, once the early instability signs were noted it may have been advantageous to respond in a more timely fashion. Ignoring engineering geology resulted in considerable costs, delays.  It should be noted that following this case study a recommendation was issued to undertake full geotechnical investigations prior to laying out any roads in landslide prone areas.


Figure 20. Geological-geotechnical map identifying the geology, old landslide scarps, the boreholes and the existing and new road alignment. 

No comments:

Post a Comment